Sociology of globalization
Blog assignment 1
1. What is Globalization?
Globalization is a complex and complex mix of factors. This article
gives a variety of views on such globalization. One is that there are many
views at the center of globalization such as world governance, world
citizenship, human rights and immigration. The other one is that globalization
is an object, a perspective and a horizon. Globalization may be understood as
the direction in which the world considered as a whole is moving.
Globalization can be viewed in many areas, such as economic,
cultural and political factors. Political globalization refers to the
development of a political infrastructure of global governance. In the past,
political globalization was attempted through warfare. Today, it is attempted
through diplomacy, often through intergovernmental organizations. Economic
globalization is the increasing economic interdependence of national economies
across the world through a rapid increase in cross-border movement of goods,
service, technology, and capital. Cultural globalization is the most visible
part of globalization such as Westernization and Mcdonaldization.
One word that represents globalization is the term 'Glocalization'.
This is a new word that has never been before. It refers to pursuing
globalization while adapting to local culture and meeting its customer
characteristics and needs. For globalization, localization strategies that
differentiate and produce products according to the needs of the local market
are very important.
There are three characteristics of globalization. First, two goals
of globalization are to increase connectivity among nations internationally and
to increase a sense of world. Second, countries around the world are joined by
many international organizations. Through international organizations, they
discuss not only domestic issues but also diplomatic and international issues.
This is one of the great features of globalization. Finally, globalization consists
of culture, society, politics, and economics. These are the main aspects of
human life.
2. Interesting point & What I learned:
What was most interesting about the article was that it talked a lot
about cultural globalization along with economic and political globalization.
In other classes, I studied Antonio Gramsci and
Steven Rooks. Rooks said three-dimensional power is easier to control than the
traditional two-dimensional power. He said control through these
three-dimensional powers - voluntary consent of the subjects - was most
effective. To explain it, Gramsci explained
it through cultural hegemony. Perhaps it's another story, but what's certain is
that culture has a powerful power to assimilate not only one society but also
another that is not entirely homogeneous.
Among the elements of cultural globalization, Westernization and
McDonaldization are new concepts that have never been found in the East, such
as Asia. But in the end, many countries have westernized to gain efficiency and
international competitiveness, and globalization has been accelerated.
I also studied why the world trade while taking international
economics classes. These are the basis of economic globalization. The
traditional (of course, most critical today) trade theory says that countries
trade because of the comparative advantage of goods between the two countries.
The premise is, of course, that trade will benefit both countries.
But more than trade profits we are talking about in economics,
economic globalization in sociology seems to give a more modern view of how the
international community is changing based on that. For
example, from the background of the emergence of WTO and NATO, the relationship
between the superpowers and developing countries was much greater. The main
focus is to develop the entire international community together if we can see
it economically. But the reality is not so. As globalization progresses, there
is a growing country and a lagging one. We need to keep an eye on those figures
and study how the world should proceed.
3. Discussion:
I have a question about the term globalization. I think we need to
think about whether globalization is right or Americanization is right. Except
China, South Korea and Japan are America's closest allies in Asia. I need to
study more about the situation in Europe, but I know that European defense is
left strictly to NATO forces in the United States, except for Russia's allies.
As such, America's influence in the world is overwhelming. Of
course, before the 20th century, the world was the center of Europe. But
Europe, where imperialism prevailed in the 19th century, ruled the colonies by
force. They could not unite the world through globalization. Rather, the
relationship between the upper and lower regions of Europe and the colonies
further estranged the world.
But after the World War, the United States emerged as a world power.
Unlike previous Europe, they advanced their own globalization into cultural,
economic, and social diverse areas with enormous military power. The United
States is now the most dominant power in the world after the Soviet Union broke
up through the Cold War.
Therefore, I think critically that future globalization will be not
globalization but 'Americanization.' We need to discuss in depth what true
globalization is.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI think it is really interesting and good to see globalization through various concepts that you know. And I agree that we should be critical of not becoming a globalized American society. As globalization is influenced by the capitalist economy, the U.S., a leading economic power, has no choice but to wield overwhelming influence. To ensure a stable future for globalization, I think countries need to prepare for economic policies and coordinate trade agreements between countries.
ReplyDelete