1) summarize in your own words of materials you
read;
The main content
of this article is that the basis of economic globalization is transnational
corporations and talk about why they are wrong to claim that they weaken the
nation's autonomy.
This article talks
in five parts: ①The
scale and geographical distribution of transnational corporations ② Why and how corporations engage in transnational activities ③The geographical embeddedness of transnational corporations ④ ‘Webs of enterprise’ manifested in transnational production networks
⑤The power relationships between
TNCS and other actors in the global economy
<The
scale and geographical distribution of transnational corporations>
‘Transnational Corporation’
means that a firm which has the power to coordinate and control operations in
more than one country, even if it does not own them. But this is wrong
definition, and these corporations were called 'global corporations'. Global
corporations are placeless, and there are no restrictions imposed by the state
or region on global corporations.
However, TNCs have
various forms and sizes, and the commonality is that they operate in different political,
social, and cultural environments.
These TNCs are
measured by statistics on FDI. Most of the world's TNCs originate from
developed countries, and at the same time most of the world's FDIs are aimed at
advanced countries. Still, even in developing countries, the number of TNCs
continues to increase and their diversity is increasing.
<Why and how
corporations engage in transnational activities>
Why
Although there are many reasons why
corporations become a transnational corporation, it can be viewed as a 'market-oriented
investment' and an 'asset-oriented investment'.
[Market-oriented investment]
Most investments are
market-oriented, because companies in their countries have reached a saturation
point. In order to increase profits, it is
going to expand its market beyond its own country and become a transnational corporation.
However, this market approach is not regulated by policy and both the size and
nature of the market have a lasting effect on the positioning of the TNC.
[Asset-oriented investment]
Geographical imbalances in the
market are one of the main reasons why corporations make transnational
investments, and the other is because corporations are geographically unequal
in producing and selling products and services.
The early TNCs were mostly natural
resources, in which case corporations must find sources of supply. Thus,
natural resource-oriented investment has a long history. Still, the advances in
transportation, communication and production technologies have led to less
natural resource-oriented investments and access to other assets, and that's
when the 'human resources' came to notice. The problem of labor costs has been
reduced because certain industrial companies need cheap labor and in developing
countries they can get cheap and flexible labor. Instead of solving labor
costs, however, the availability of well-educated, highly skilled, highly
motivated workers has increased, and if these resources are coupled with cheap
labor costs, this is the perfect choice.
How
There are two main ways for corporations
to develop TNC activities : ① Through
greenfield investments ② Through strategic
cooperation with other corporations such as mergers and acquisitions
Greenfield investment is an
investment through the construction of a whole new facility. However, because
building a whole new facility is a dangerous adventure, most develop TNC
activities through strategic cooperation with other companies.
In fact, the growth of FDI in
recent years has been achieved through M&A, another widely used TNC
expansion method in addition to this M&A is strategic alliances with one or
more other companies. Working with more than one other company creates an
alliance 'network' and the relationship between affiliated companies develops
into a 'partisan' relationship instead of a two-way one. And this has spread to
competition, creating a new 'network' of economic power, and collective
competition. Unlike mergers and acquisitions, strategic alliances focus on
specific business issues. Because only a portion of the business operations of
the participating companies are involved, the firms remain separate and rather
competitive in areas other than specific business issues. By building the network,
they want to pursue strategic goals together to achieve goals that cannot be
achieved by the enterprise alone.
While proponents of strategic
alliance say this is a way for companies to win over each other, critics say
there is a potential risk that strategic alliances can lose key technologies to
competitors.
<The geographical embeddedness of transnational corporations>
While TNCs are now widely prevalent
in the global economy, location and geography still have a significant impact
on how TNCs produce and behave. Therefore, it is inevitable to take into
account the location characteristics of the nation and the community. The place
of origin of the TNC also has a dominant influence. It has enormous influence
because a particular production social system is inherent in a particular
society.
However, not all TNCs in the same
country are similar. There is a unique corporate culture that results from the
history of any particular corporation. Nevertheless, the global economy affects
the organization and behavior of corporations.
<‘Webs of enterprise’ manifested in transnational production
networks>
<The power relationships between TNCs and other actors in the
global economy>
It is insufficient to regard corporations
as independent. All corporations are made up of complex and dynamic networks
such as production, distribution, and consumption, and are included in them.
These networks are becoming more widespread geographically and controlled by
the TNC.
The TNC is most correct to regard
it as a 'a dense network at the center of a web of relations'. TNCs require a
more sophisticated organizational structure than firms in a single country
because of their geographical nature of dispersed across different political,
cultural and social environments.
The geographic composition of TNC
production activities is obvious.
① It is to
concentrate production in one place. It creates an economy of production scale,
but increases transportation costs, weakening corporations in remote markets.
② Special production for local/national markets. At this time,
economies of scale are limited by market size.
③ Establish a specialized production structure for the local market.
④ It breaks
down the production process and places each part in the form of a different
regional, transnational vertical production integration.
The TNC is constantly involved in
the process of restructuring, reorganization and rationalization. At any time,
some parts may grow rapidly, others may experience stagnation, and others may
be declining. TNCs rely on other companies to meet their many needs, and the
relationship between TNCs and other companies as customers is fluid, both
organically and geographically.
The geographic range of
transnational production networks varies widely, but in fact few can be said to
be truly 'global.'
However, the most noticeable trend
in recent years is that these networks have a multinational network of
neighboring market groups. Simple geographic proximity in itself is a strong
incentive to consolidate operations. While these regional strategies provide
many of the efficiencies and benefits of globalization, they can more
effectively respond to organizational barriers. Thus, from the TNC perspective,
regional strategies can provide an ideal solution for the competitive pressures
for organizational response and global integration. The transnational
production network, organized on this regional scale, is particularly evident
in the three triad regions, in Europe, North America and East Asia, and
represents North America's NAFTA and Europe's EU. There is no such thing as
NAFTA or EU in East Asia, but there is a local production network mainly by
Japanese companies.
The organization and geographic
location of large TNCs, and their transnational production network, are
extremely complex and dynamic. Since the TNC is networked across the country,
it inevitably creates tension among other important actors in the global
economy, such as the state, community, workers, consumers, and civic groups. All
transnational production networks are affected and included by a multi-stage
regulatory system. And since all the components of the super-state production
network are regulated within the political structure of a nation, it is the
nation that has the most important and profound impact. As a result, the TNC
and the country continue to be involved in a complex process of negotiation.
Meanwhile, the TNC is trying to
take advantage of the national differences in regulatory regimes in these
situations, but the state wants to minimize such regulatory financial
transactions and impose them through competitive bidding against other
countries. The situation is particularly complex at this time, as the country
is geographically fixed, but the TNC is flexible.
In other words, there is a
territorial imbalance between the successive territories of the country and the
discontinuous territories of the TNC, which develops into a complex negotiation
process. However, the state does not fail to sanction these TNCs, and the state
still has considerable authority. Therefore, it is nonsense to argue that the
nation is powerless in front of the TNC.
In the end, the TNC may be
powerful, but it does not have absolute power.
2) mention of any new, interesting, or
unusual items learned;
I learned about
specific differences between TNCs and global companies, and newly learned that
companies do not all become TNCs. And I've learned a new lesson about what TNCs
mean in this globalization, and I've learned that they have to be sanctioned
because they belong to the state, even if they're not powerful. I've already
read a fourth article about globalization, and I didn't know before that if
globalization was done through this complicated and complex process, I've
learned from this article on Economic Globalization that the TNC is not just a
simple and trivial issue in globalization.
3) identify at least one question,
concern, or discussion angle;
It is a question
that we have discussed in class, and this article deals with NAFTA in North
America and the EU in Europe, but there is no such organization in East Asia at
this time. There are many reasons why such an organization is not currently
established in East Asia, but perhaps one day it will happen in East Asia, too?
I think it doesn't happen in Asia for a variety of reasons. First of all, the
difference in economic power between East Asian countries is too extreme, and
the difference in national power is also huge. So I don't think it will work in
East Asia, but I would like to discuss what it would look like if it happened.
Comments
Post a Comment